Manual testing and automation testing are two different approaches to software testing, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Here’s a comparison of manual testing vs. automation testing:
𝟏. 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: In manual testing, testers execute test cases manually without using any automation tools. They follow test scripts and use the software as an end user would, exploring different scenarios and providing subjective feedback.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: In automation testing, testers use automation tools and scripts to perform test cases. Test scripts are written to automate repetitive and time-consuming test scenarios.
𝟐. 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, especially when testing large and complex applications. It may not be as efficient for repetitive tasks.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing is faster and more efficient for repetitive and regression testing. Once automation scripts are created, they can be run multiple times with minimal effort.
𝟑. 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing relies on human judgment, which can introduce human errors or inconsistencies. Testers may miss some defects due to oversight.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing provides consistent and repeatable results. It eliminates human errors and ensures that all test cases are executed precisely as defined in the scripts.
𝟒. 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing is better suited for exploratory testing, where testers use their creativity and intuition to uncover unexpected defects.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing is less effective for exploratory testing, as it follows predefined scripts and may miss defects that were not anticipated during script creation.
𝟓. 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing is generally more cost-effective for short-term or ad-hoc testing efforts. It requires fewer upfront investments in tools and automation infrastructure.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing can be expensive initially due to the setup and maintenance of automation frameworks and scripts. However, it often offers cost savings in the long run for repetitive testing tasks.
𝟔. 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐬. 𝐋𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing can start early in the development process, even before a stable build is available. Testers can perform exploratory testing and validate requirements.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing is most effective when a stable build is available, as it relies on UI elements and features being relatively consistent.
𝟕. 𝐌𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Test cases in manual testing do not require much maintenance. Testers need to update test documentation when there are changes in requirements or test cases.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation scripts require regular maintenance to adapt to changes in the application’s UI, functionality, or requirements. Maintenance can become a significant overhead.
𝟖. 𝐒𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲:
– 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Manual testing is suitable for small-scale projects, one-time testing, and exploratory testing.
– 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Automation testing is ideal for large-scale projects, regression testing, and projects with long-term maintenance needs.
If you are looking for any services related to Website Development, App Development, Digital Marketing and SEO, just email us at nchouksey@manifestinfotech.com or Skype id: live:76bad32bff24d30d
𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐔𝐬:
𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐧: linkedin.com/company/manifestinfotech
𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤: facebook.com/manifestinfotech/
𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦: instagram.com/manifestinfotech/
𝐓𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫: twitter.com/Manifest_info
#ManualTesting #AutomationTesting #SoftwareTesting #QA #TestingMethods #TestAutomation #QualityAssurance #TestCases #TestingTools #TestingStrategies #RegressionTesting #ExploratoryTesting #TestEfficiency #TestingComparison #ManualVsAutomation #TestingProsAndCons #TestAutomationBenefits #TestAutomationChallenges #TestingBestPractices #TestAutomationFramework #TestingCosts #TestingAccuracy #TestingSpeed #AgileTesting #DevOpsTesting #ContinuousIntegration #SoftwareDevelopment #QualityControl #TestingLifecycle #TestingMethodology